Dei'ah veDibur - Information & Insight

A Window into the Charedi World

17 Shevat 5759 - Feb. 3, 1999 | Mordecai Plaut, director Published Weekly
NEWS

IN-DEPTH
FEATURES

OPINION
& COMMENT

HOME
& FAMILY

VAAD HORABBONIM HAOLAMI LEINYONEI GIYUR

TOPICS IN THE NEWS

HOMEPAGE

News
Does Uncle David Really Want Us?

Editor's Note: The thoughtful article by Moshe Schapiro about his experiences in the Israeli Army elicited a number of interesting responses, which we are presenting here. We are also including another letter that appeared last week in the Hebrew Yated because of its relevance to the issues discussed here.

Who Should Serve?

To the editor:

Mr. Moshe Schapiro ("Uncle David," 27 Teves) advises us that "even one second [in the army] is much too long." Fine. Would he please tell us what his alternative is? Should nobody go to the army? If he holds that we should do away with the army completely, then let him say so befe molei.

Or perhaps he holds that only non-frum Jews should serve in the army. Bechol haTorah kulah we don't find that a non-frum Jew has fewer obligations than anybody else. On the contrary, Schapiro's piece, from beginning to end, is an argument that as many frum Jews as possible should serve! Everybody agrees that there are problems of the sort he mentioned -- one would have to be a fool to deny it, although my experience in tironut (which consisted of all of two weeks!) was certainly a lot better than his --no problem at all with tefilla betzibbur, food that was mehadrin, no chillul Shabbat. But the only way to correct the situation that he describes is to increase the ratio of frum to non-frum Jews in the army.

Danny & Dena Kurtz

Bet El

The Author Responds:

My main objective in writing this article was to point out that besides the theological arguments against conscripting yeshiva bochurim, the IDF's disregard for enforcing its own self-imposed regulations makes it virtually impossible for religious individuals to serve in the army and maintain an acceptable level of Torah observance. I believe that I proved this claim quite conclusively.

Unfortunately Danny and Dena Kurtz missed the point of my article. I come to this conclusion because in their critique they cite only the second half of my closing sentence, which in the original reads (and I quote): "As things stand today, even one second is much too long." The first clause of the sentence conveys clearly the point that I am making -- i.e., that the IDF today is a hostile spiritual environment for people who take religion seriously, but that things don't have to remain that way forever.

Thus, in answer to Mr. Kurtz's question, "What is [the author's] alternative?" I say simply that the Ministry of Defense and the IDF should start cleaning up their act and live up to their own sacrosanct "rules and regulations." Let them back up their claims with concrete actions. This is my proposal.

When this objective is accomplished and religious individuals such as myself will be able to rest assured that they won't be fed treif or forced to desecrate Shabbos needlessly, then we can start discussing the extent of the religious community's involvement in army service. But not before.

The remainder of Mr. and Mrs. Kurtz's comments are irrelevant to my article. Questions such as who should serve in the army and under what terms are for the gedolei Torah to decide. We will do whatever they say.

I would like to take this opportunity to thank the residents of Bet El (where Mr. and Mrs. Kurtz live) for the generous hospitality they extend to soldiers on duty. You can't imagine what those marvelous cups of steaming coffee and cake mean to a frozen reservist manning a roadblock in the middle of the night. Thanks, and keep them coming!

Moshe Schapiro

We Do Not Go Because Learning Should not be Interrupted

To The Editor:

I greatly enjoyed Moshe Schapiro's article "Uncle David Wants You" in the 27 Teves edition. He has lucidly pointed out the serious problems facing religious soldiers in the IDF, making it out of the question to consider even compromise solutions to the controversy over drafting yeshiva bochurim.

However, in counterpoint to his testimony of negative experiences as a conscript and reserve soldier, may I offer a few words of limud zechus with regard to the IDF?

Had Moshe Schapiro been with me at the time of my initiation into the Army in 1984 (at the age of 30, with two small children), he would have found a greater level of adherence to Army regulations. As equipment was being issued, an officer summoned the religious soldiers forward to receive a second mess-tin and silverware (he doffed his cap to show us that he himself was not religious, and thus not extending protexia).

Later, the base's katzin dat (officer of religious affairs) brought the religious soldiers to a spot beside the kitchen, where we kashered the mess-tins and silverware we'd received. He explained to us our rights with regard to religious observance, and asked who wanted to be supplied with glatt meat (which was in fact provided to those who requested.)

Religious soldiers were excused from a portion of the standard morning duty, and every day there was a substantial minyan in the base shul. Of course, we had to hustle in order to daven, gulp down a two minute breakfast, and rejoin our unit for completion of the morning duty -- but I don't think we were much worse off than the other soldiers.

My induction was shortly before Pesach. We were sent home for the Seder, and after coming back we found the base storeroom stocked with an immense quantity of hand matzos from the BaDaTz of the Eida Chareidis. Those matzos sustained me and a comrade almost until the end of our basic training several weeks later.

While drilling for the ceremonies that were to close our basic training, we were reminded time and again by our non- religious officers to say "ani matzhir" (I declare) rather than "ani nishba" (I swear) in the swearing-in ceremony.

In my experiences as a reserve medic in the years since, serving mostly in border outposts on the Golan Heights and the northern border, I have never found any post so small that it does not have a room set aside as a shul, nor found the shul locked. It may be little larger than a broom closet, with no furnishings other than an Aron Kodesh and a couple of wooden benches -- but it serves the purpose of providing a quiet spot away from the barracks for davening, learning and introspection.

When I need to go out on a night patrol, I have generally managed to get assigned to the second patrol on Shabbos night (thus enabling me to bring in Shabbos and make Kiddush without undue pressure) and to the second patrol on motzei Shabbos (thus avoiding altogether the additional chillul Shabbos). It's just a matter of explaining the situation -- well before Shabbos -- to the person responsible for drawing up the duty roster.

I have not had any instances of ill-treatment or denial of rights as a result of my observance. My feeling is that, having made clear to my companions and commanders that I have my own standards regarding kashrus, Shabbos and personal behavior, and that I am not part of their crowd, I earn their respect rather than dislike.

I could go on much further with my "war stories." However, my intention is neither to rebut Moshe Schapiro nor to defend the Army. I simply wish to point out the problematic aspect of citing our individual experiences in the draft controversy. If we tallied up all the testimony of all the frum soldiers who have served in the IDF, pro and con, and found the positive to outweigh the negative, would we agree to drafting the bochurim? If agreements were reached to ensure the technical and administrative apparatus needed to mend the negative aspects of Army life in the realms of kashrus, Shabbos, etc., would we agree?

Certainly not! The issue has been decided, and not simply because the Israeli Army is no place for a nice Jewish boy, but because no interruption in the learning of a yeshiva bochur can be tolerated.

Sincerely,

Yosef Branse

Rechasim

The Author Responds:

It is indeed unfortunate that I was not with Yosef back in '84 -- his base commander deserves a commendation. Too bad they don't all embrace the same approach.

Needless to say, I agree with Yosef Branse that the issue of drafting the bochurim should not be settled according to the results of a survey of religious soldiers' experiences. My point was that until the army cleans up its act and provides to all soldiers everywhere, the opportunity to observe basic laws such as Shabbos and kashrus, the army is indeed no place for a nice Jewish boy. It's not a very difficult thing to do -- where there's a will, there's a way. What has been lacking so far is a will.

I hope sincerely that airing out this issue will bring about a change for the good.

Moshe Schapiro

To The Editor:

I read with interest Moshe Schapiro's article regarding his adventures in the Israeli army. I also was put in a similar position, experienced basic training and many years of reserve duty. Although my conclusions were similar, I thought perhaps my point of view might be of interest. I also was conscripted at an older age, married and with children. I served until (kein ayin hora) the size of my family exempted me from further participation (about 10 years).

I also catered my own meals for many years; I survived very well and earned the respect of my compatriots. I never had a confrontation with the authorities (either in the rabbinate or in the military). I was treated respectfully at every turn; my experience was that any religious need was graciously filled; perhaps not to the standards that I would have preferred, but always graciously.

When I had the misfortune to be "on duty" during Pesach, the army brought me more handmade shemura matzos than I could possibly deal with. When I was in "service" during the shmittah year, care was always taken to bring me vegetables appropriate to my needs. When I had personal religious (or other) needs, my fellow (non-religious) soldiers willingly and graciously rearranged their own lives to accommodate me (even at serious inconvenience to themselves).

Of course, I do not deny that the kashrus in the army is virtually nonexistent, nor do I deny that Shabbos observance leaves very much to be desired. I would have preferred to daven under more conducive circumstances. I could regale the reader with as many stories equally as entertaining (or depressing) as the author's. However, those are not the reasons why I would never send my children to the army. If our children are not strong enough or knowledgeable enough to withstand the temptations of a few morsels of poorly cooked and unappetizing food served and cooked by the slobs the author described, woe is us!

My own complaints lie more in the realm of modesty and peer pressure. The proximity of the genders and the casual and intimate relations fostered by the military regime and constant stress are virtually irresistible. The army is literally run by our Jewish daughters. They are present at every turn holding the most responsible positions. They are the teachers and the administrators. They are the problem solvers and the social workers. Contact is unavoidable and inevitable. Our drafted children would be at the height of adolescence, hormones overactive, and the peer pressures overwhelming. Who could possibly resist?

On the positive side, the opportunities for education and kiruv are boundless. The very presence of a chareidi Jew in full "battle" regalia (beard and payos...) is a "wonder" in and of itself. The reality that said apparition borders on humanity is beyond belief.

I am not a learned man, nor do I have a facile tongue. I am not able influence my fellow Jews using my Torah erudition or brilliant logic. However, I cannot begin to relate how many fellow Jews came to me over the years with questions; how many simply wanted to talk; how many opinions, how many deeply ingrained animosities (with Hashem's help) I was able to reconstruct, just by being there!

The opportunities to mekadesh sheim Shomayim are awesome. We must not forget that although our beards and payos are very familiar and beloved to us; they are not so well known to everybody. Our "payelach" and "tzitzkelach" are unfortunately alien and threatening to a very large segment of the Jewish nation. It is our duty to rectify this; not by throwing stones on Shabbos, not by outraged waving of rule books; rather by displaying our own good midos and values; by providing a positive examples and role models.

The army is one of the only remaining forums where Jews of different hashkofos meet. It is one of the few frameworks where person to person contact can actually occur.

Permit me to relate a few heartwarming stories of my own:

On one occasion, I was confined to a guard tower with another Jew (vocally anti-religious in his views); we spent the entire night together awake, with little to do but look out the window (guarding) and talk. As usual, the subject of religion and religions Jews was high on the conversation priority list.

A few days later this same Jew came to speak with me: the previous day he had been riding the bus in Bnei Brak as usual. Suddenly it occurred to him (he told me): "Maybe all those other (black hatted people) are like you?" My month of incarceration in the army base was worth it for that one comment.

On another occasion it was my turn to guard at a certain place on Shabbos. I told my fellow soldiers that I would take their shifts so that they wouldn't need to mechalel Shabbos to relieve me. I asked them to please not call me on the radio nor in any way break the Shabbos on my account unless there was an emergency. I settled in for a quiet and pleasant (relatively) Shabbos alone in the guard house.

But my fellow Jews were too compassionate to leave me alone. Not knowing that I would never eat it, they kept driving out to bring me food, to keep me company ("you might DIE out there alone") . . . The entire day I had not a moment of peace because of their beautiful (although misplaced) good feelings. Nothing I could say would dissuade them.

On another occasion, I was on a training exercise. I found my fellow soldiers cooking "our" dinner in their helmets over a Primus stove, unfortunately making a serious error in kashrus which precluded any religious Jew from sharing the meal. I brought their attention to the mistake; you cannot imagine how genuinely upset they were, how sincere and heartfelt their charata and embarrassment.

These Jews are not momerim lehach'is or even letayovon. They are tinokos shenishbe'oo. They desperately need guidance and education. They need exposure and proximity. Only we can provide these. We may be making a severe and serious mistake by denying them this unique opportunity.

Noah Greenberg

Bezalel Editions Limited

Safed

The Author Responds:

I agree wholeheartedly with Reb Greenberg that there are endless kiruv opportunities in the army. Jewish souls behave very differently when disconnected from the mind- curdling influence of television for more than 24 hours. I too spent many a shift conversing amicably with nonobservant partners who grudgingly admitted that my behavior called into question the pat stereotypes drilled into them by the media. In fact I had some of my best conversations with a member of Kibbutz Mizra (where they raise swine), and I even got him to open a Chumash for the first time in his life.

The point of my article is that in the army's present state, the negative outweighs the positive. It's a case of chayecha kodmim -- "Your life comes first." A person has an obligation to save a fellow Jew, but not at the expense of losing his own life in the process.

Editor's Note:

The following letter appeared in the Musaf Shabbos Kodesh of last week (Parshas Beshalach). Because of its relevance to the issues discussed in the other letters (though they do not deal with this specific issue) we are including it here.

Were Religious Soldiers Left by the IDF to Die?

To the Editor:

I would like to bring your attention to a little known fact about not protecting the soldiers of the "religious brigade" that once was a separate unit.

In his book, Armed Before the Camp, S. Goren wrote about a reason for not acceding to the demand that was raised to set up religious units of the army:

"In addition to these [other reasons] there was a security consideration that was serious and decisive [by itself] that cannot be discussed here. Indeed, it was not long before the accuracy of that security consideration was revealed to all, in all its seriousness."

This secret reason that Goren hinted at is also referred to in Hashkofoseinu, by HaRav Y. A. Wolff:

"The military situation was hopeless, and many were killed near Latrun. A religious brigade fought near Faluja, in the approximate vicinity of Kommemiyus, and very few returned. In the newspaper about of the municipality of Bnei Brak about three years ago they wrote that the IDF could have saved more of the soldiers from that [religious] brigade . . . and a religious army unit was never set up after that."

Here there is a fairly clear accusation of abandoning the religious unit that fought in the Faluja pocket. (If I am not mistaken, even in recent times in the general press there were accusations of different treatment for religious combat soldiers in the war in Lebanon.)

Perhaps it would be worthwhile to investigate the accusation about Faluja, which Goren -- who without a doubt knew something about what was happening behind the scenes -- hinted at.

Thank you.

Tzvi Kirshenbaum

Rishon Letsion


All material on this site is copyrighted and its use is restricted.
Click here for conditions of use.